Nancy Hart
Well-known member
Thanks for posting this. The part in red is probably the most important part of the whole bill, but few mention it. Without that part there is no point in the rest. I think Donald Trump and even many Republicans would be willing to reverse the Medicaid cuts part..... "Senator Fetterman voted in favor of House and Senate Democrats’ alternative Continuing Resolution that would have kept the government open while negotiations on full-year bipartisan appropriations continue. The Democrats’ proposal would have extended the Affordable Care Act premium tax credits, reversed GOP Medicaid cuts, and ensured Congress—not President Trump or OMB Director Russell Vought—determines how taxpayer dollars are spent. No Senate Republicans supported the measure."
But Russell Vought is one of the authors of Project 2025. The section on health care states clearly that the ultimate goal is to privatize health care. The first step they propose is to make Medicare Advantage (Part C) the default. In other words, unless you are paying attention, when you turn 65 you will get put into a Part C plan. And who would trust an "independent" consultant to give you the best advice in that situation.
Even as things are now, it's difficult to change from Part C to regular Medicare with Medigap coverage.
And also without that part, it doesn't matter what Congress passes, the OMB director can change how the funds are used unless or until the Supreme Court says he can't. So when the Republicans propose we just pass the extension of govt funding part now, and consider the health care cuts in a separate bill later? First, there isn't enough time left in this calendar year to consider another bill. And second, even if there were enough time, could you guarantee that OMB would comply with what Congress passes.