What's new
DiscussionHQ - General Discussions

DiscussionHQ is a general discussion forum that has opened December 2024!
We provide a laid back atmosphere and our members are down to earth. We have a ton of content and fresh stuff is constantly being added. We cover all sorts of topics, so there's bound to be something inside to pique your interest. We welcome anyone and everyone to register & become a member of our awesome community.

The Expansion of the Universe Could Be a Mirage...

Joe Riley

Super Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Messages
938
Location
PA
New research looking at the cosmological constant problem suggests the expansion of the universe could be an illusion.

ydpsncMiE6rHH2mN7caMP4-1024-80.jpg.webp

Astronomers use the light from distant stars, such as the Helix Nebula seen here, to measure the apparent expansion of the universe. New research suggests there may be more to the picture that we're not seeing. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSC)

"The expansion of the universe could be a mirage, a potentially controversial new study suggests."

"This rethinking of the cosmos also suggests solutions for the puzzles of dark energy and dark matter, which scientists believe account for around 95% of the total energy and matter in the universe but remain shrouded in mystery. The novel new approach is detailed in a paper published June 2 in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, by University of Geneva professor of theoretical physics Lucas Lombriser."


"Scientists know the universe is expanding because of redshift, the stretching of light's wavelength towards the redder end of the spectrum as the object emitting it moves away from us. Distant galaxies have a higher redshift than those nearer to us, suggesting those galaxies are moving ever further from Earth."

"More recently, scientists have found evidence that the universe's expansion isn't fixed, but is actually accelerating faster and faster. This accelerating expansion is captured by a term known as the cosmological constant, or lambda. The cosmological constant has been a headache for cosmologists because predictions of its value made by particle physics differ from actual observations by 120 orders of magnitude. The cosmological constant has therefore been described as "the worst prediction in the history of physics."


Our expanding universe: Age, history & other facts
 
I sometimes get the impression that the Big Bang hypothesis is desperately grasped as an essentially religiously motivated thing. Even among those claiming to be non-religious, and despite the amount of evidence piling up against it and the number of holes that have been found in it. But some will insist that there must be some finite creation event.

What about a model where the universe is infinite and constant, where some process continuously creates new matter and energy? Just add "condensing matter" on top of that. The particles getting smaller and smaller and smaller forever. Those close enough stay clumped together.

So to our naïve eyes things are expanding, celestial bodies moving apart. But the longer (in time) that light has to travel to us the more we have shrunk (along with all of our yardsticks) so we have the illusion of a "red shift" to confirm our bias.

But light didn't change, only matter i.e. us.

Primordial egg? Ok. What if that was just a beginning where there was one infinitely large particle filling the entire universe in some very far distant past?
 
New research looking at the cosmological constant problem suggests the expansion of the universe could be an illusion.

ydpsncMiE6rHH2mN7caMP4-1024-80.jpg.webp

Astronomers use the light from distant stars, such as the Helix Nebula seen here, to measure the apparent expansion of the universe. New research suggests there may be more to the picture that we're not seeing. (Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSC)

"The expansion of the universe could be a mirage, a potentially controversial new study suggests."

"This rethinking of the cosmos also suggests solutions for the puzzles of dark energy and dark matter, which scientists believe account for around 95% of the total energy and matter in the universe but remain shrouded in mystery. The novel new approach is detailed in a paper published June 2 in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity, by University of Geneva professor of theoretical physics Lucas Lombriser."


"Scientists know the universe is expanding because of redshift, the stretching of light's wavelength towards the redder end of the spectrum as the object emitting it moves away from us. Distant galaxies have a higher redshift than those nearer to us, suggesting those galaxies are moving ever further from Earth."

"More recently, scientists have found evidence that the universe's expansion isn't fixed, but is actually accelerating faster and faster. This accelerating expansion is captured by a term known as the cosmological constant, or lambda. The cosmological constant has been a headache for cosmologists because predictions of its value made by particle physics differ from actual observations by 120 orders of magnitude. The cosmological constant has therefore been described as "the worst prediction in the history of physics."


Our expanding universe: Age, history & other facts

Too much for this old brain, sounds interesting though.
 
I sometimes get the impression that the Big Bang hypothesis is desperately grasped as an essentially religiously motivated thing. Even among those claiming to be non-religious, and despite the amount of evidence piling up against it and the number of holes that have been found in it. But some will insist that there must be some finite creation event.

What about a model where the universe is infinite and constant, where some process continuously creates new matter and energy? Just add "condensing matter" on top of that. The particles getting smaller and smaller and smaller forever. Those close enough stay clumped together.

So to our naïve eyes things are expanding, celestial bodies moving apart. But the longer (in time) that light has to travel to us the more we have shrunk (along with all of our yardsticks) so we have the illusion of a "red shift" to confirm our bias.

But light didn't change, only matter i.e. us.

Primordial egg? Ok. What if that was just a beginning where there was one infinitely large particle filling the entire universe in some very far distant past?


I have no idea how anything like this came about, don't think anybody on earth does. Its all just a theoretical guess.
 
Back
Top